Sarah Palin must be high on lipstick! In her piece in yesterday's Washington Post (NOT written by her, I believe), she claims that the summit in Copenhagen this week is based on agenda driven policies that won't change the weather and will merely drive up debt. She further claims that future climate research should be based on sound science and not political agendas as it is now.
Sarah, aren't YOU the one with ethical issues? You’re like the pot calling the kettle black, or the rat that smells the cheese first. You eat too much red meat, woman. Pit bulls do get aggressive when they eat raw meat. Back off and do your homework. You're fortunate to live in Alaska where you can look out on miles of fresh, green terrain.
Of course, it's hard to believe that there are parts of the world where people can hardly breathe because of the pollutants in the environment. Don’t you read the news? This is a global problem, not a Wasilla trailer park issue.
Palin also writes about how the Climate-Gate villains would not allow their critics to speak their minds in "Peer-reviewed Journals." Ha ha ha. I think that was her dig at Katie Couric for asking her what she reads. That would make a good answer in future interviews. Question; "What do you read to keep up on world issues, Sarah?" Answer by Sarah: "Mostly peer-reviewed journals." There you go. Check that off of her 2012 campaign list. She’s got one answer prepared already.
Read Sarah Palin's "Piece";
- ► 2016 (14)
- ► 2015 (14)
- ► 2014 (12)
- ► 2012 (76)
- ► 2011 (23)
- ► 2010 (24)
- ▼ December (7)